The Lebanon Daily Star raises the question as to why did President Bush at this point in time propose the Annapolis conference when to all intensive purposes it is doomed to failure? The editor points out, “all of the principal actors are political weaklings at home, and the very purposes of the gathering” are confusing. The threat of a US-Iranian conflict and continual problems in Gaza hovers over the gathering. “Under these and several other limiting circumstances,” the editor notes, “it is difficult (if not impossible) to see how this effort to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict can succeed where others– with better organization, stronger leadership, and more committed mediators– have failed.”
Part of the problem that is identified by the newspaper arises from Bush’s miserable standing in the Middle East arising from the Iraq War fiasco. The trust level he has is limited. The newspaper challenges the ability or desire of President Bush to place pressure on Israel to make necessary concessions that will move forward negotiations. The inability of Secretary of States Rice to even achieve a commitment from Israel to agree on an agenda, let alone a timetable, is an ominous sign. Likewise, the inability of the Palestinian Authority to compel groups like Hamas to adhere to any agreement does not bode well for this exercise in diplomacy. The invitation to Syria is an important step in involving all groups with concerns to participate, but why has no similar invitation been offered to Hamas?