Tag Archives: prisoner release

Israel Government Wants Prison For Shooters

The Israel government has asked the Supreme Court to rescind its release of a West Bank settler who shot two Palestinians in Hebron last week. State prosecutor Ze’ev Braude wants the settler who shot the Palestinians during the evacuation of Hebron’s House of Contention must go to jail and not simply be under house arrest. The Court has allowed him to remain in the Hebron area as long as he is within the area of his home. The Supreme Court is arguing there is insufficient evidence the Israeli settler was not under threat by the Palestinians.

The defense of Braude that he acted in self defense is a bit hard to accept given that the two Palestinians did not possess weapons. It is decisions such as these that place into question the integrity of Israel law when it comes to issues of Palestinians getting shot by Israelis. We can assume if a Palestinian shot two Israelis the decision would be immediate prison.

Five Arab Newspaper Reactions To Carter Visit!

We present today, reports from Arab newspapers pertaining to the visit by former President Jimmy Carter to the Middle East. We will report what they say and refrain from making negative comments since the public is entitled to know how Carter’s visit was seen by many Middle Eastern nations. We believe in the importance of dialogue with ALL groups. However, we do not necessarly agree with all statements that are printed today.

Syria Times: Editorial

“Despite strong criticism by the US and Israel, Carter was able to break up restrictions imposed by the Israelis to meet senior Hamas officials in Cairo…Carter is brave and quite right when he stressed that attempts made by the US to undermine Hamas were counterproductive and that Israel’s arbitrary blockade on the Gaza Strip is a crime…However, Carter’s nine-day tour of the region ….is plausible in the sense that a lasting peace he is seeking based on ending all forms of occupation and agression and on returning rights to their legitimate Arab owners. The tour is perhaps an opportunity for the US to reconsider its imbalanced ME policy and to put things in the right course before futher calamities befall on peoples of the region as well on the Americans and Israelis.”

Oman Tribune: Editorial

Carter is doing what is logical and realistic. He is talking with Hamas. Having been the architect of one historic peace deal, the Nobel Laureate has his ears to the ground in the region and has the confidence and trust of many Arabs. …Unlike the blind bigwigs in the higher echelons in Washington, he knows that Hamas, which won parliamentary elections considered free and fair, has widespread support and hence cannot be ignored. And it is possible that this trip can pave the way for seismic shifts in the Middle Eastern scenarios if the Democrats come to power in the November presidential elections. But, under the present circumstances, with the Israel brutalization of the Gazans and Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s shennanigans, an accord before January 20th next year, when George W. Bush leaves office, is the stuff of day dreams.”

Saudi Gazette: News story

“…former US President Jimmy Carter said that Hamas is prepared to accept the Jewish state’s right to “live as a neighbor next door in peace.” Carter met twice with (Khaled) Meshaal over the weekend. Commenting on efforts to persuade Hamas to back peace talks between Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israel, Meshaal said his group would ‘respect Palestinian national will even if it was against our convictions.’ But Meshaal told reporters in Damascus that Hamas had informed Carter it could not declare a unilateral ceasefire with Israel as the former US president had requested in the Syrian capital because similar moves in the past failed to stop what Hamas describes as Israeli aggression. Meshaal’s remarks appeared in line with comments made by Carter in Jerusalem Monday following talks with the Hamas leader Friday. Carter said Meshaal told him that Hamss would a ccept a peace deal creating a Palestinian state alongside Israel if it was approved by Palestinians in a referendum. ”

Daily News of Egypt: News Story

“Former US president Jimmy Carter said on Monday the Islamist Hamas movement had told him it would recognize Israel’s right to live in peace if a deal is reached and approved by a Palestinian vote. ‘They said that they would accept a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders if approved by Palestinians and that they would would acceept the right of Israel to live as a neighbor, next door.’ In a letter read out by Carter, the Islamists said they were also willing to form a new government with the mdoerate Abbas-their arch foe and the leader of the secular Fatah party. ‘We are ready to negotiate with president Abbas on forming a coalition governmen and to have a professional police force and to form a government not from Hamas or Fatah but from technocrats.’ Carter stressed there was near universal consensus that no progress had been made in peace talks since they were restarted at a US conference in November, and that Palestinians are increasingly angry as Israel continues to develop settlements and maintains hundreds of roadblocks in the occupied West Bank. He insisted Hamas and Syria had to be involved in any attempt to resolve the Middle Eastern conflict. ‘The preesent strategy of excluding Hamas and excluding Syria is just not working. It only exacerbates the cycle of violence, misunderstanding and animosity,’ said Carter. ‘We believe the problem is not that I met with Hamas in Syria, the problem is that Israel and the United States refuse to meet these people,’ he told the Israel Council on Foreign Relations think-tank.”

Kuwait Times: News Story

Hasmas leader Khaled Meshaal said. “We have offered a truce if Israel withdaws to the 1967 borders, a truce of 10 years as a proof of recognition. Meshaal used the Arabic word, ‘hudna’ meaning truce, which is more concrete than ‘tahdiya, a period of calm’ which Hamas often uses to describe a simple ceasefire. Hamas implies a recognition of the other party’s existence. Washington, which refuses to deal with Hamas and has not backed Carter’s mission, said it saw no change in the group’s positions…Carter has also said direct Israel-hamas talks could facilitate the release of a captured Israeli soldeir, Cpl. Gilad Schalit, who has been held in Gaza for nearly two years. Israel agrees in principle to trade 1,000 Palestinian prisoners for Schalit, but after back-and forth talks through Egyptian intermediaries, has approved only 71 of the specific prisoners that Hamas wants freed. Meshaal yesterday appeared to acquiesce with that number, saying that once Israel releases the 71 Palestinians, Hamas would hand over Schalit to the Egyptians and then continue negotiations until the number of prisoners reaches 1,000.”

Hamas Expresses Defiance To World

Hamas leader, Khaled Mashaal, defiantly told the world the only road open to the people of Palestine was “resistance.” He claimed some Europeans offered to facilitate unofficial meetings with Israel and he responded with “one thousand nos.” On the other hand, he did speak in a conciliatory way toward rival Fatah led by President Abbas and offered to hold unconditional discussions with the Palestinian Authority. “We are ready for a dialogue without conditions. Our hands are extended and all matters should be put on the table including elections.” He also insisted no Israel soldier in their hands would be returned without receiving in return the release of several key Palestinian leaders.

Perhaps Mahsaal doesn’t grasp the contradiction inherent in his remarks. On one hand, he rejects discussions with Israel and a cease fire, but on the other hand, he is willing to negotiate with Abbas who wants peace with Israel and a cease fire. Both goals are incompatible with one another. A mistake was made in failing to include Hamas at the Annapolis Conference. Mashaal has to be in a room with other Arab nations who are tired of the war between Israel and Palestine and seek peace. They will control him, not Israel.